CONVICTED (2022) | Chloe Birkin, born 9 February 1988, of Oldgate Lane, Thrybergh, Rotherham S65 – kept 17 distressed animals inside her “putrid” home.
RSPCA officers found faeces on walls, rotten food and an “eye-watering stench” when they attended Birkin’s home after a call from social services in April 2021.
Inside, they found eight dogs, only two of whom were not kept in a closed bedroom or a pen. They also found nine cats, three of whom were kittens kept with their mother in a pen next to rotten food.
A treadmill was set up with leads hanging off it, which was how the dogs were being walked. There was also no water in bowls out to drink.
The animals all needed treatment for a range of illnesses, including conjunctivitis, sneezing, ear infections and diarrhoea.
In court Birkin said she was left unable to get out of bed and care for her numerous pets after receiving cosmetic surgery six weeks earlier.
Her solicitor, Mr Glenn Cook, told the court: “It led to a situation where she wasn’t physically capable to look after these animals and her environment deteriorated rapidly.
“It left the house in a horrendous state.”
When asked by district judge Timothy Spruce why she had so many animals, Mr Cook said: “She always has. She loves animals. It’s what her family does.
“But not in the future, I must stress. Simply, her environment has vastly improved and she has no intention of getting any more animals.”
Birkin pleaded guilty to failing to take the animals for treatment and failing to keep the house hygienic for their needs.
Speaking for the RSPCA, solicitor Ms Charlotte Farrier told the court Birkin had cooperated “fully” with the animal welfare charity and it was not interested in banning her from keeping pets, and was happy for her to keep two of the dogs going forward.
In sentencing, Judge Spruce handed Birkin a £400 fine and ordered her to pay a further £340 in costs.
“The number of animals involved in this case would be difficult for anyone to look after properly,” said the judge.
“But given the context of your surgery at the end of March, which left you bedridden and incapable of looking after them, it was always going to be a recipe for disaster.
“Fortunately, the RSPCA were alerted by social services to this issue relatively early. The short duration of neglect means the animals can make a good recovery once they are in the care of the RSPCA.
“There’s a lesson in this isn’t there? In knowing your own limitations. It’s not easy to look after that many animals.
“I take the RSPCA’s lead and will not impose a disqualification order, or a deprivation order for those two dogs, who can be returned to your – much improved – home.
“I’m confident I won’t see you back here.”
The court heard all the animals have made a full recovery and have all now been rehomed with new owners.
Sentencing: a total of £740 in fines and costs. No ban.
Excuses excuses excuses sounds utterly pathetic!!, there’s no excuse for animal neglect and cruelty!